Español Alemán Francés Inglés Italiano Portugués Ruso
Hora local en Cuba:

Lunes, 14 Noviembre 2011 14:07

Genocidal Cynism (Part I)

Escrito por 
Valora este artículo
(0 votos)

No sane person, especially someone who has had access to the elementary knowledge acquired in  primary school, would agree that our species, especially those who are children, teenagers or  youth,

should be deprived of the right to live, today, tomorrow and forever.  Never have human  beings, throughout their eventful history, as persons endowed with intelligence, ever heard of an experience like that. 

I feel the duty to convey to those taking the trouble to read these Reflections the opinion  that all of us, with no exception, are obliged to create awareness about the risks that  humankind are running in an inexorable manner, towards a final and total catastrophe as the consequence of irresponsible decisions made by politicians who fate, rather than talent or  merit, has placed the destiny of humankind in their hands

Whether they are citizens of their country or not, whether they are followers of some  religious belief or unbelievers, no human being in their right mind would agree that their  children or closest kin should perish precipitously or as victims of atrocious and torturous  misery. 

On the heels of the repugnant crimes that are being increasingly committed by NATO under the  aegis of the United States and the wealthiest countries in Europe, the gaze of the world  focused on the G-20 meeting where the profound economic crisis affecting every nation today
should have been analyzed. International opinion, especially in Europe, was awaiting an answer  for the profound economic crisis that, with its serious social and even climatic implications,  is threatening every inhabitant on the planet. At that meeting, it was being decided whether
the Euro would be able to be kept as the common currency for most of Europe and even whether  some of the countries would be able to remain in the community. 

There was no answer or solution of any kind for the most serious problems of the world economy  despite the efforts of China, Russia, Indonesia, South Africa, Brazil, Argentina and other  emerging economies, anxious to cooperate with the rest of the world in the search for solutions for the serious economic problems affecting them.

What was unusual was that just when NATO concluded the Libyan operation – after the air attack  that injured the constitutional head of that country, destroyed the vehicle carrying him and  leaving him at the mercy of the empire’s mercenaries who murdered him and exhibited his body as a war trophy, violating Muslim customs and traditions – the IAEA, a UN body and an  institution that ought to stand for world peace, released the political, money-driven and  sectarian report putting the world on the brink of war with the use of nuclear weapons that the Yankee empire, in alliance with Great Britain and Israel,  has been meticulously preparing  against Iran.

After the veni, vidi, vici of the famous Roman emperor more than two thousand years ago,  translated to “I came, I saw and he died” broadcast for public opinion by an important  television network as soon as the death of Gaddafi had been learned of, there are more than enough words to describe US policy.

Now what is important is the need to create clear awareness in the peoples about the abyss  towards which humankind is being led.  Twice our Revolution lived through dramatic dangers: in  October of 1962, the most critical of all where humankind was on the brink of nuclear holocaust; and in mid-1987 when our forces were facing racist South African troops armed with  nuclear weapons that the Israelis had helped them create.

The Shah of Iran also collaborated, along with Israel, with the racist and fascist South  African regime.  

What is the UN? An organization driven by the United States before the end of World War II.  That nation, whose territory was considerably far away from the theatre of war, had incredibly  increased its wealth; it accumulated 80% of the world’s gold and under the leadership of Roosevelt, a sincere anti-fascist, it promoted the development of the nuclear weapon that  Truman, his successor, a mediocre oligarch, did not hesitate in using against the defenceless  cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.  

The world’s gold monopoly in United States’ power and the prestige of Roosevelt handed the US  the Bretton Woods agreement, assigning it the role of issuing the dollar as the only currency  to be used for decades in world trade, with no limiting factor other that it’s being backed by the gold metal.

At the end of that war, the US was also the only country possessing the nuclear weapon, a  privilege it did not hesitate in transmitting to its allies and members in the Security  Council: Great Britain and France, the two most important colonial powers in the world at that  time.

Truman had not even informed the USSR one single word about the atomic weapon before using it.  China, at that time governed by Nationalist General Chiang Kai-shek, a pro-Yankee  oligarch, could not be excluded from that Security Council. 

The USSR, seriously stricken by the war, destruction and the loss of more than 20 million of  its sons and daughters in the Nazi invasion, dedicated considerable economic, scientific and human resources to bring its nuclear capacity up to par with that of the United States.  Four years later, in 1949, it tested its first nuclear weapon: the H-bomb in 1953; and in 1955 its first megaton bomb.  France had its first nuclear weapon in 1960.

There were only three countries that had the nuclear bomb in 1957 when the UN, under the aegis of the Yankees, created the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA).  Does anybody think that US instrument did anything to warn the world about the terrible dangers to which it would expose human society when Israel, unconditional US and NATO ally, located in the very heartland of the world’s most important oil and gas reserves, would become a dangerous and aggressive nuclear power?

Its forces, cooperating with colonial British and French troops, attacked Port Said when Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, French property; this forced the Soviet premier to send an ultimatum demanding the ceasing of that aggression that the European allies of the US had no alternative other than to attack. 

To be continued tomorrow.

Fidel Castro Ruz
November 12, 2011
8:15 p.m.


Leer 8581 veces Modificado por última vez en Lunes, 14 Noviembre 2011 14:23

Escribir un comentario


Código de seguridad
Refescar